Enterprise AI systems need context to provide accurate, trustworthy answers. But confusion persists about two critical approaches for delivering this context: RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) and semantic layers. Understanding when to use RAG, when to implement a semantic layer, and how they differ is essential for building effective AI systems.
Both RAG and semantic layers are methods for delivering context to AI. This is the foundation of understanding the relationship between them. They work similarly in principle: a chatbot or AI agent connects to either RAG or a semantic layer to retrieve relevant information. The key difference lies in what type of data they handle and how they provide that context.
When discussing RAG in AI contexts, we're primarily talking about RAG as a technology, a specific approach to storing and retrieving information using vector databases. This is distinct from RAG architecture, which is a broader system that incorporates RAG technology along with other components.
At its core, RAG technology consists of three fundamental components:
Embeddings are the foundation of RAG technology. An embedding is essentially a segment of text that has been converted into a numerical vector representation. The strategy for creating embeddings is critical:
The system can return just the embedding, the full document containing the embedding, or multiple embeddings, depending on the specific use case.
RAG has become essential because it solves a fundamental problem: large language models can only know what they were trained on, and that training data has a cutoff date. According to AWS, RAG extends the capabilities of LLMs to specific domains or an organization's internal knowledge base without the need to retrain the model.
When you ask an LLM about recent events, internal company data, or specialized domain knowledge, it often generates plausible but incorrect information, known as hallucinations. As explained by IBM, RAG addresses this by giving AI systems access to up-to-date, domain-specific knowledge at query time.
Consider a pharmaceutical company implementing RAG for its research team. When a scientist asks, "What were the adverse events in our Phase 2 trial for compound XYZ-123?" the system retrieves specific clinical trial documentation, regulatory submissions, and safety reports. The LLM then generates an accurate response grounded in the company's actual data, complete with citations.
Critical Understanding: RAG is designed specifically for unstructured data (documents, text files, PDFs, reports). It's a specialized technology for working with text that can't be queried with traditional methods like SQL.
A semantic layer is fundamentally different from RAG in its scope and purpose. While RAG is a specific technology for unstructured text retrieval, a semantic layer is a broader approach for collecting and organizing large volumes of information, both structured and unstructured.
A semantic layer sits between raw data sources and AI applications, translating technical database structures into business-friendly concepts. According to Dataversity, it converts metadata from data sources into a cross-organization semantic knowledge graph.
A modern semantic layer typically combines multiple technologies:
Think of a semantic layer as a universal translator for your data. Your databases contain technical field names like "cust_purch_amt_ytd" that make sense to engineers but confuse business users. The semantic layer maps these to business concepts like "Customer Annual Purchase Amount" and ensures "Revenue" means the same thing across sales, finance, and operations.
For AI systems, the semantic layer is even more critical. When an AI agent needs to query data, it must understand:
.png)
RAG is a specific technology with a defined implementation (vector database + embeddings + similarity search).
Semantic Layer is a broader framework that combines multiple technologies to provide business context. A semantic layer can even include RAG as one of its components.
RAG and semantic layers are not competing solutions. It is important to mention that these two solutions serve different purposes and are often used together.
Consider these scenarios:
Modern enterprise AI often requires both approaches. Users ask questions that span structured database queries and unstructured document retrieval. The semantic layer can even govern which documents flow into RAG, leveraging metadata about ownership and permissions.
Understanding these distinctions helps organizations design AI systems that deliver accurate, trustworthy answers by combining the right technologies for their specific needs.
In our next article, we'll explore how RAG and semantic layers work together in practice, and how modern context layer solutions address both structured and unstructured data challenges simultaneously.
Keep reading and take a deeper dive into our most recent content on metadata management and beyond:
.png)
