Be aware of the data feeding your models. Ignoring this data increases the risks associated with most of the dangers mentioned below. Large language models (LLMs) are like a super hungry caterpillar, especially one that's still in the "training" or "fine-tuning" phase.  

‍

Why?  

‍

A caterpillar eats everything it finds. Just like the LLM consumes massive amounts of text (books, articles, websites) during training. It doesn't judge or filter. It just "eats" and stores patterns.

‍

The caterpillar is always hungry. LLMs require enormous datasets to learn effectively, always needing more data to improve accuracy, generalization, and performance.

‍

The caterpillar grows bigger and bigger. As the LLM trains on more data, its parameters expand (e.g., from GPT-2 to GPT-4), becoming more powerful, knowledgeable, and capable.

‍

Eventually, it turns into a butterfly. After enough training, the LLM emerges as a "finished product" ready to be deployed for beautiful, generative tasks like writing, coding, summarizing, etc.

‍

In the story of the Very Hungry Caterpillar, the caterpillar gets a stomachache from eating too much junk (cake, sausage, lollipops…). Similarly, LLMs can:

• Absorb harmful biases or misinformation
• Overfit on noisy or low-quality data
• Produce hallucinations or misleading outputs

‍

Which is why "data diet" matters in training LLMs, just like nutrition matters to the caterpillar. It makes sense; we suppose. Let's move on to learn about the dangers and the steps to manage them.

‍

10 AI dangers

1. Data privacy breaches

AI systems rely heavily on large volumes of data, often including sensitive or personal information. Improper handling of this data during training or deployment can result in serious privacy violations and non-compliance with data protection laws.

‍

Take action:

• Inform users or customers about what data is collected, how it will be used, and whether any personal information is included.
• Provide a clear option to opt out of data collection wherever possible.
• Where real data is not necessary, consider using synthetic data generated to mimic patterns without exposing individuals.

‍

2. Model bias and unfair outcomes

When historical or unbalanced data is used to train models, AI systems can replicate and reinforce discrimination. This can lead to unfair treatment in areas like hiring, lending, or healthcare.

‍

Take action:

• Ensure that training data is well-documented, traceable, and evaluated for representativeness. Metadata management plays a key role here by making the data origin and structure transparent.
• Establish clear ownership and review processes that bring business, compliance, and data teams together before models are used in production.
• Monitor real-world model behavior and document how fairness is being assessed, flagged, and improved over time.

‍

3. Lack of explainability

When AI systems produce outcomes that users cannot understand or justify, trust quickly erodes. This lack of transparency is especially problematic in regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, or insurance, where organizations must be able to demonstrate how decisions are made. Even in less-regulated environments, the inability to explain AI behavior creates barriers to adoption and exposes companies to operational and reputational risks.

‍

Take action:

• Start by embedding explainability requirements early in your AI-related processes. Don’t treat explainability as an afterthought; define from the beginning what kind of documentation, transparency, and reasoning will be expected from each model or automated decision system.
• Use metadata to document not only the data feeding into the model but also the context: where it came from, how it’s used, and what assumptions underpin the logic. A platform like Dawiso can help by making this metadata accessible to both technical and non-technical users, giving everyone the tools to trace how decisions were made.
• In addition, assign ownership for AI systems, so that someone is accountable for ensuring decisions can be explained and defended. Build spaces for business and compliance users to annotate models or decisions with plain-language context, especially where outputs influence sensitive or high-stakes outcomes.
• Finally, create a habit of reviewing model behavior with cross-functional teams. Discuss not just the accuracy, but also how understandable and justifiable the decision paths are to a wider audience, and whether those explanations are consistent with business and regulatory expectations.

‍

4. Overreliance on AI

AI outputs are not always correct. Overtrusting automation, especially without human review, can lead to poor decisions and increased risk. Blindly trusting model outputs, especially in complex or changing environments, can lead to costly errors, missed context, or decisions that conflict with business logic or ethical expectations.

‍

Take action:

• Treat AI as an advisor, not an authority. Build processes that keep human judgment in the loop, especially for high-impact or customer-facing decisions.
• Use documentation tools to clearly define when and how AI-generated insights are meant to be used.

‍

5. Data quality issues

Even the best AI models cannot perform well if the data behind them is inconsistent, incomplete, or outdated. Poor-quality data leads to unreliable predictions, misleading insights, and wasted resources. In many organizations, the root cause is a lack of transparency and control over data sources.

‍

Take action:

• Establish clear ownership and documentation for every dataset used in model development. Use a data catalog to track where data comes from, how it’s transformed, and whether it’s suitable for analysis.
• With Dawiso, you can bring visibility to the data lifecycle by linking datasets to business terms, owners, and quality control indicators. This helps teams identify issues early and maintain confidence in the data that powers AI.

‍

6. Compliance and regulatory risk

Without proper documentation and control, it becomes difficult to prove that AI is used responsibly, and easy to fall out of compliance with laws like GDPR, the EU AI Act, or sector-specific standards in finance, healthcare, or telecom…

‍

Take action:

• Make AI governance part of your broader compliance framework. Define and document where AI is used, what data it touches, who is responsible, and how decisions are made.
• Tools like Dawiso support this by giving you a structured way to document data sources, purposes, and ownership. With clear data lineage and context, you can respond quickly to audits and ensure that AI-related risks are visible and traceable. Dawiso’s AI governance application provides a centralized inventory of AI use cases, automated documentation, and built-in AI risk assessments.

‍

7. Model reuse risk

Reusing pre-trained models, third-party components, or templates can accelerate development, but it also introduces hidden risks. These models may include embedded biases, outdated logic, unclear licensing terms, or assumptions that don’t match your business context. Without full visibility, it becomes difficult to assess whether the reused model is truly fit for purpose.

‍

Take action:

• Treat external or reused models like any other critical component: verify their origin, understand how they were trained, and assess whether they align with your goals and constraints.
• Use metadata to document the source, training data, assumptions, and known limitations of each model. Dawiso allows you to maintain this information alongside ownership, usage policies, and integration points, so reused models are transparent and accountable across teams.

‍

8. Existential risks

Concerns about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and superintelligent systems may sound futuristic, but they are being taken seriously by researchers, regulators, and business leaders. The fear is that AI could reach a point where it operates beyond human control, with unknown, potentially irreversible consequences. While these risks may not be immediate for most enterprises, ignoring them could leave organizations unprepared for how AI will evolve.  

‍

Take action:

• Stay informed about emerging developments in AI and their broader implications. Build internal literacy by encouraging your teams to explore current research, policy discussions, and ethical debates.
• Establish a flexible data governance framework now, so that if AI capabilities evolve rapidly, your organization already has the controls, transparency, and roles in place to respond responsibly.

‍

9. Lack of accountability

As AI systems are deployed across business functions, it becomes increasingly difficult to answer a simple but critical question: Who is responsible for what the system does? Without clear ownership, audit trails, and documentation, accountability disappears, which is particularly dangerous in regulated sectors or high-stakes decisions.

‍

Take action

• Assign clear roles for data, models, and decisions. Use metadata tools to record how models were built, tested, and approved.
• With Dawiso, you can link data and documentation to owners, contributors, and reviewers, making responsibility visible and traceable at every stage.

‍

10. Environmental impact

Training and running large AI models consumes vast amounts of energy and water, contributing to carbon emissions and environmental strain. These effects are often invisible to business stakeholders but significant at scale, especially when deploying infrastructure-heavy models.

‍

Take action

• Choose AI solutions and infrastructure providers that prioritize sustainability.
• Reuse models when possible, instead of retraining from scratch (but be aware of the risks that this could include).
• Make efficiency part of your governance criteria (not just model performance).
• Platforms like Dawiso help track what models are used, how often, and by whom, making it easier to optimize for both business value and environmental responsibility.

‍

It matters for enterprises because…

• Enterprises make infrastructure and modeling choices that affect energy and water consumption.
• ESG reporting, sustainability goals, and reputational concerns are increasingly tied to how responsibly companies use AI.
• Customers, investors, and regulators are beginning to hold companies accountable for the indirect impact of their AI operations.

‍

Now is the time to make AI and data governance a priority. Organizations that proactively address AI-related risks will be better equipped to build trust, stay compliant, and scale AI with confidence. Dawiso helps you establish the foundations: understand your data, track its origin, and know exactly what is feeding your models.

‍